Background: In part one of this assessment, I wrote, “If the defiled-bed narrative in the Steele dossier is, indeed, a […]
“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” Alternatively attributed to John Maynard Keynes, Paul […]
A parallactic observation ensues from viewing a distant object from different vantage points, thereby seeing the object framed by two […]
Standing on the shoulders of this methodical evidence, it seems at this point that no amount of contrary evidence, exposure or implosion will ultimately kill the undead Russiagate monstrosity. If that were possible, the Thing would have been put irrevocably into the ground over a year ago. And six months ago, and a few weeks ago.
That the praying mantis kills and consumes its mate to derive sustenance seems unbelievable and wrong, until it is witnessed […]
This is the Agency’s second attempt at using MSNBC’s disgraced Ken Dilanian to disseminate reports attacking Korea negotiations
Four recent developments concerning nuclear power (and nuclear proliferation) are of such moment that our projections must be adjusted by our consideration of these matters. NATO’s intervention in Libya and the death of Muammar Gaddafi, the North Korean nuclear weapons program, the Iranian nuclear program as adjusted by the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and Russia’s objectives in this domain, each form sides of a prism: actions involving nuclear power and nonproliferation that we contemplate or initiate must address the ensuing refractions.
One year ago, a State Department press event included quite possibly the most epic “deer in the headlights” moment in all of government press briefing history.
Agency’s leak to a known “mop up man” represents a new low for the intelligence community
Disobedient Media recently reported on discoveries made by the Forensicator in their report, Media Mishaps: Early Guccifer 2 Coverage. In […]
Trump’s nominee for CIA Director is Gina Haspel. Haspel was station chief of the Thailand black site, Fall 2003, known […]
Reports casting Mifsud as a Russian intelligence asset do not object to the concept that Mifsud worked as a spy. Their claim simply depicts him as working for the wrong master, and in so-doing, rests the beating heart of the Trump-Russia-collusion scandal on a single inaccurate premise.