Why did the Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict lie about Davis’s role in their press release in response to his arrest? Does truth and accountability mean nothing in the world of humanitarian aid?
When news of the cut in communications emerged yesterday, friends and supporters of Assange immediately leapt into action, with Kim Dotcom and Suzie Dawson organizing an online vigil under the banner of #ReconnectJulian. Meanwhile, supporters on the ground in London gathered in front of the embassy, live streaming as they stood in solidarity for hours, metres from the confined Wikileaks Editor-In-Chief.
In August, it was widely reported that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch had used the email alias ‘Elizabeth Carlisle’ for official emails, including emails in relation to the infamous tarmac meeting between Lynch and former President Clinton in the summer of 2016.
anyone who supports, allies, or works with Wikileaks is a potential target for complicated, sometimes entirely fabricated, character assassination. In the case of Assange and Todd and Clare, the fabricated allegations of pedophilia were proven to be blatantly false. This casts light on other smears surrounding Wikileaks supporters, and suggests that the organization poses a serious threat to establishment interests.
The Forensicator’s latest analysis of the so-called “Clinton Foundation” file, published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona, fits into previously observed time gaps. This suggests that the data was curated from a larger selection of information, and potentially supports their earlier analysis of the NGP-VAN meta data.
New analysis indicates that individual acquiring alleged DNC data was not a hacker, copied locally.
Associate Editor Elizabeth Vos’s commentary regarding death threats compiled by Julian Assange from a report by Disobedient Media, can be heard […]