In Part One, we covered the background and construction of a smear campaign built by Duncan Campbell over the past […]
Gina Haspel, President Trump’s pick for CIA Director, is notorious among CIA veterans for her implementation of illegal and ineffective […]
Earlier today, CIA whistleblower and member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) John Kiriakou personally delivered a letter to the Ecuadorian embassy in Washington, DC, which was addressed to Ecuadorian Ambassador, Francisco Jose Borja Cevallos.
The document calls for the immediate restoration of communications for Wikileaks Editor-In-Chief Julian Assange.One week ago, Julian Assange’s internet, phone calls and access to visitors were totally cut off at the behest of Ecuadorian President, Lenin Moreno.
If you’ve gotten whiplash due to the widening dissonance between reality and legacy press coverage of the Russian hacking narrative, […]
Author and journalist HA Goodman’s latest publication, “DEBUNKING the TRUMP RUSSIA MYTH: How Democrats Pushed Another Cold War to Justify Clinton’s Loss,” analyzes the mind numbing hypocrisy surrounding the presentation of the now-debunked Russian hacking narrative.
Adam Carter has published a new article which states that authorities including Robert Mueller and Jeff Sessions have been informed of the latest information debunking the Russian Hacking narrative: pretended ignorance on this matter would be unacceptable.
California Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher has released a statement on Thursday calling for hearings regarding possible collusion between the Clinton Foundation and Russia. Rohrabacher had sent a letter to House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce on Wednesday.
The future of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange appears more uncertain, with American republicans divided on whether to pardon him or label Wikileaks as a ‘hostile non-state intelligence service.’ Republican Dana Rohrabacher, indicated that Assange could be pardoned in light of alleged proof which would debunk Trump-Russia.
The New York Magazine’s coverage of the issue was disconcertingly inaccurate.